Jurisdictional Challenges of the Shari‛Ah Courts: A Comparative Evaluation of the Experience in Nigeria And Zanzibar
The Shari‛ah embraces the Muslims total way of life. Muslims are required to judge theiraffairs in accordance with Islamic law. Those who do not judge with what Allah (s.w.t.) Hasrevealed are not seen as a true believer in the sight of Allah (s.w.t.). Thus, submitting affairsto be judged in accordance with the Shari‛ah is fundamental to the Muslims’ right to reallypractice their religion. To achieve this, sound institutions like the Shari‛ah Courts withadequate powers and jurisdictions need to be put in place to ensure that Muslims properlyjudge their affairs in accordance with the Shari‛ah. Despite this, Shari‛ah Courts in Nigeriaand Zanzibar are faced with a number of challenges which prevent them from properly hearingand determining the Shari‛ah matters placed before them. This is notwithstanding the teamingMuslim populations in these countries. One of such challenges is that the Court is notempowered to decide all Shari‛ah matters. Rather, their jurisdictions have been limited toIslamic personal law. This is in addition to the appellate challenges being faced in the twojurisdictions. The paper discusses these jurisdictional challenges in a comparative natureowing to the similar problems in the two jurisdictions. In doing this, constitutional andstatutory provisions are analysed and interviews conducted with some stakeholders are used

Related Articles